Worship is about God and for believers.
Another, from a church that ranks Adoration and Outreach/Evangelism as highest priorities:
Worship is about ushering people in to the presence of God.?Ç
Two that emphasize Community and Outreach:
We desire to be a caring family of multiplying disciples influencing our community and world for Jesus Christ.?Ç
Our philosophy of worship at our church is that we are God’s people sharing the love of Christ.
Which of these four approaches describes your church? Of these four philosophies of worship, rank them in order of importance for your service:
- Adoration
- Community
- Discipleship
- Outreach
A greater self-awareness of a congregation’s philosophy of worship allows it to be more strategic in its direction. For example, a church whose worship identity is strongly tied to community and discipleship can cease fighting against this reality and design worship that fits strategically with building up a body of believers through community and discipleship. Similarly, a large church seeking to create an alternative service may consider creating an identity that is opposite to the main service, in order to connect with those in the body marginalized by the main service’s “feel.” For example, the church above might consider an alternative service whose identity is strongly tied to adoration and outreach.
Discover your own philosophy of worship
Individuals on the worship team may each have their own unique approach to worship. That is fine. Each of our local congregations is all a part of the larger universal Church. The key is to decide what you want worship to be. In our time as consultants and observers, we have seen more than one worship service erupt because of an unwillingness to address the foundational question of worship philosophy.
2. A statement of worship methodology and style
We have discussed worship methodology through other articles such as Temporary “Contemporary” Worship and Being Cultural and Counter-Cultural at the Same Time.
The point we frequently must reassert is that every worship service has a particular methodology. It is impossible to remove cultural and historical context. There is no answer to the question, Why can’t we just forget all of that stuff and worship God? Every church must decide on its own where to position itself on the cultural continuum, from “traditional” congregations that continue to practice eighteenth and nineteenth-century methodologies, to “contemporary” congregations discovering innovative, fringe methodologies, to “emerging” congregations who are looking to the ancient past for what are once again fresh methodologies, and everything in between.
Further, methodology is an extension of philosophy. A service with an emphasis on outreach will be eager to embrace the latest methodological models, such as the use of media in worship, in order to be culturally relevant. A discipleship-oriented service may have less concern about such trends.
Style stems from methodology and refers to music and the arts, to visuals and creativity, to preaching, to use of participation and interactivity.
Three examples of a statement about methodology:





Pal Gyomai said,
Wrote on August 22, 2007 @ 12:35 pm
Great article, Len And Jason. You point out some very valid issues that are so important to be defined. Keep up the good work.
Dan Norton said,
Wrote on August 22, 2007 @ 2:47 pm
Wow! This should be mandantory readng for every church Worship Ministry participant. Thank you for the insight.
Rev. Randall Scheri said,
Wrote on August 22, 2007 @ 9:44 pm
May I download this article? I would like to form a worship team with my church and would like to have as much “teaching” material for them as possible. Thanks.
Philis Griffin said,
Wrote on February 16, 2009 @ 7:15 pm
This is a timely article. I plan to pass it onto the worship team at our church. We are growing and need to recognize that what was our purpose or method several years ago, maybe be different this year. Thanks for your sound theology and insight.
Carlos H. Sheffield said,
Wrote on February 17, 2009 @ 8:27 pm
I am thoroughly impressed. Just recently, at my church there was a lively debate regarding the worship-style that is presented to the congregation and visitors on a weekly-basis.
This is an 82 yr old afro-centric United Methodist Church that is struggling to stay afloat. Attendance has declined drastically. More and more of the young adults and committed tithers are slowing making their way to either the Baptist or non-denominational affiliates.
The division is ‘Music’. The more contemporary and progressive style of worship in the 21st Century church is absent at my church. ‘Praise and Adoration’ is wonderful but we are not necessarily caught-up in that atmosphere. But we do want to see a more lively service as opposed to one that lulls one to sleep!
It doesn’t help any when you have a minister who is a throwback to a time when hymns and anthems were the norm in the Methodist Church.
It is hard to relate to a church that is turning an blind eye and deaf ear as to what is taking place in today’s church. We have individuals who attend the Holy Boldness Seminars that are geared to strengthening the church in urban areas, and they are relaying the message of how we must make a change in the way we continue to worship in the same — dated,stale,lifeless — manner as our great-grandparents.
Again,I am impressed with the different variations in which a church can worship and only wish that mine would be more receptive to change…even just a smidgen.
Linda K. Ferrell said,
Wrote on February 17, 2009 @ 11:04 pm
Purpose , myself I like on purpose !!!!!
Linda K. Ferrell said,
Wrote on February 17, 2009 @ 11:12 pm
Very well put, I think more church’s should let the church as a Whole . GOD loves me just like you the same,