<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Make Better Song Lyrics Slides for Worship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com</link>
	<description>Church Creativity Worship Media Design Art Team Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:44:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jhing</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-10511</link>
		<dc:creator>jhing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-10511</guid>
		<description>cool.. can you please email me more loop videos to be use for our praise and worship concert next two weeks thank you i find your videos very good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool.. can you please email me more loop videos to be use for our praise and worship concert next two weeks thank you i find your videos very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pamsyx</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-10486</link>
		<dc:creator>pamsyx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-10486</guid>
		<description>Would like to email great article to our tech team but I keep getting an image verification error</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to email great article to our tech team but I keep getting an image verification error</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MO Guys</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-10362</link>
		<dc:creator>The MO Guys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 03:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-10362</guid>
		<description>Absolutely not Ray. Right in the first paragraph we distinguish between valuable volunteers and what appears to be, at least to one reader, a lame attempt at humor with a reference to the &quot;church monkey&quot;. The reference connotes no one at all; it&#039;s just a device to refer to the most basic level of knowledge and skill. We could have easily have said a caveman, as in, &quot;so easy a caveman could do it.&quot; But then we&#039;d offend the cavemen of the world.

For the record, we value volunteers highly. Any church would grind to a halt in its ministry endeavors without the dedicated service of volunteers. Shoot, one of us - Jason - is a volunteer at his church, in the area of worship design.

Thanks for allowing us the opportunity to clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely not Ray. Right in the first paragraph we distinguish between valuable volunteers and what appears to be, at least to one reader, a lame attempt at humor with a reference to the &#8220;church monkey&#8221;. The reference connotes no one at all; it&#8217;s just a device to refer to the most basic level of knowledge and skill. We could have easily have said a caveman, as in, &#8220;so easy a caveman could do it.&#8221; But then we&#8217;d offend the cavemen of the world.</p>
<p>For the record, we value volunteers highly. Any church would grind to a halt in its ministry endeavors without the dedicated service of volunteers. Shoot, one of us &#8211; Jason &#8211; is a volunteer at his church, in the area of worship design.</p>
<p>Thanks for allowing us the opportunity to clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray M.</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-10354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-10354</guid>
		<description>I see several references to church volunteers as &quot;church monkeys&quot;.  Is that what you leaders really think of your helpers?  As a volunteer myself, I find the use of that term quite disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see several references to church volunteers as &#8220;church monkeys&#8221;.  Is that what you leaders really think of your helpers?  As a volunteer myself, I find the use of that term quite disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osborn4</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-9692</link>
		<dc:creator>osborn4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-9692</guid>
		<description>I think the left hand rule is more for a page full of text, rather than a screen full.

I usually center, but will left justify or right justify depending on the background. Some of the right justfied stuff looks pretty freaky, if the line length varies greatly.

But I really like the look of centered text. And as long as we stick by the 7 x 7 rule (no more than 7 lines of text with no more than 7 words on each line), we&#039;ve been ok. 

Actually, we generally don&#039;t have more than 4 lines of text, but sometimes more than 7 words. I like for the worshippers to not have to search to find thier place, if they reopen thier eyes to grab the next words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the left hand rule is more for a page full of text, rather than a screen full.</p>
<p>I usually center, but will left justify or right justify depending on the background. Some of the right justfied stuff looks pretty freaky, if the line length varies greatly.</p>
<p>But I really like the look of centered text. And as long as we stick by the 7 x 7 rule (no more than 7 lines of text with no more than 7 words on each line), we&#8217;ve been ok. </p>
<p>Actually, we generally don&#8217;t have more than 4 lines of text, but sometimes more than 7 words. I like for the worshippers to not have to search to find thier place, if they reopen thier eyes to grab the next words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-9665</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 13:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-9665</guid>
		<description>This is always good, whether or not it is a few years old.

One issue that I haven&#039;t seen addressed here is the practice of centered text on a slide versus left-justified text.

I have always been taught that centered text (especially in song lyrics, and even moreso with new songs) causes people&#039;s eyes to work harder to locate the start of the next line when compared to left-justified text.

I have been successful in placing the text left edge in various parts of the screen, and think it looks cleaner than the staggered edge of centered text.

What do you think?
Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is always good, whether or not it is a few years old.</p>
<p>One issue that I haven&#8217;t seen addressed here is the practice of centered text on a slide versus left-justified text.</p>
<p>I have always been taught that centered text (especially in song lyrics, and even moreso with new songs) causes people&#8217;s eyes to work harder to locate the start of the next line when compared to left-justified text.</p>
<p>I have been successful in placing the text left edge in various parts of the screen, and think it looks cleaner than the staggered edge of centered text.</p>
<p>What do you think?<br />
Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joec</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-9549</link>
		<dc:creator>Joec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-9549</guid>
		<description>Thanks MO Guys,
   This is great and will be wonderful for the new crew at our little church. 
   Just last week we had a full discussion on now to display lyrics.
Now I have it is writing from the media Gurus. 
Thanks again,
   Joe C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks MO Guys,<br />
   This is great and will be wonderful for the new crew at our little church.<br />
   Just last week we had a full discussion on now to display lyrics.<br />
Now I have it is writing from the media Gurus.<br />
Thanks again,<br />
   Joe C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Findlay</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-9359</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Findlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-9359</guid>
		<description>While I think most of the article is great, I have two comments.

Firstly, I think that points 4, 7 and 8 should be combined into one about readability.  In my opinion and experience, images as backgrounds, even if they have a &quot;plain&quot; section for the lyrics, are distracting from the message of the song.  It also makes it hard to pick colours that are readable over the whole image.  You were discussing continuity of slides in terms of font size, but it should really be extended to include font face and colour, as well.

In my church, pretty much everyone (young and old) preferred when we switched to white text on black slide, because it was much more readable, and allowed them to focus on the meaning of the words to them with no distraction or image dictating what the meaning should be.

Secondly, you forgot transitions, word art and plug-ins.  Nothing is more distracting and annoying in a worship service than the &quot;wavy water reflection&quot; plug-in, the red-to-yellow gradient tapering into the distance of &quot;Superman&quot; style word art, or crazy transitions (checkers, screen flip, diamonds, word zip) between slides.  You don&#039;t need them, as, again, it distracts from the song and the lyrics.  Just go with a plain cut.

If you&#039;re not convinced about the transitions yet, here&#039;s another reason.  Time it and see how long it takes to fully switch slides.  It&#039;s usually 1-3 seconds, which means that you have to switch slides while people are still reading the last line, and you still miss the first couple words of the next slide.  This is especially evident in fast songs such as &quot;Rising&quot; or &quot;Prince of Peace&quot; that have lots of words.  If you just use a straight cut, it happens much quicker, and you can wait until the last word of the slide is sung and still make it for the first word of the next.

Remember, it&#039;s just a slide, not a work of art.  The focus is on the words of the song and on worshipping God.  It needs to be functional over all else, ie: readable, both within slides and between slides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think most of the article is great, I have two comments.</p>
<p>Firstly, I think that points 4, 7 and 8 should be combined into one about readability.  In my opinion and experience, images as backgrounds, even if they have a &#8220;plain&#8221; section for the lyrics, are distracting from the message of the song.  It also makes it hard to pick colours that are readable over the whole image.  You were discussing continuity of slides in terms of font size, but it should really be extended to include font face and colour, as well.</p>
<p>In my church, pretty much everyone (young and old) preferred when we switched to white text on black slide, because it was much more readable, and allowed them to focus on the meaning of the words to them with no distraction or image dictating what the meaning should be.</p>
<p>Secondly, you forgot transitions, word art and plug-ins.  Nothing is more distracting and annoying in a worship service than the &#8220;wavy water reflection&#8221; plug-in, the red-to-yellow gradient tapering into the distance of &#8220;Superman&#8221; style word art, or crazy transitions (checkers, screen flip, diamonds, word zip) between slides.  You don&#8217;t need them, as, again, it distracts from the song and the lyrics.  Just go with a plain cut.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not convinced about the transitions yet, here&#8217;s another reason.  Time it and see how long it takes to fully switch slides.  It&#8217;s usually 1-3 seconds, which means that you have to switch slides while people are still reading the last line, and you still miss the first couple words of the next slide.  This is especially evident in fast songs such as &#8220;Rising&#8221; or &#8220;Prince of Peace&#8221; that have lots of words.  If you just use a straight cut, it happens much quicker, and you can wait until the last word of the slide is sung and still make it for the first word of the next.</p>
<p>Remember, it&#8217;s just a slide, not a work of art.  The focus is on the words of the song and on worshipping God.  It needs to be functional over all else, ie: readable, both within slides and between slides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Davis-Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-8958</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Davis-Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-8958</guid>
		<description>This article is really helpful and hiliarious too, thank you for your caring help and humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is really helpful and hiliarious too, thank you for your caring help and humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Design Through Visual Consistency &#124; Midnight Oil Productions</title>
		<link>http://www.midnightoilproductions.com/reading/how-to/bettersonglyrics/comment-page-1/#comment-8522</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Design Through Visual Consistency &#124; Midnight Oil Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://75.125.201.194/?page_id=670#comment-8522</guid>
		<description>[...] Osborn4 on Technorati ConfirmationProPresenter 4 Coming Soon! &#124; Midnight Oil Productions on How To Make Better Song Lyrics Slides for WorshipDaniel Hahn on The End of Worship Media (As We Know It)The MO Guys on The Back to Work Saleosborn4 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Osborn4 on Technorati ConfirmationProPresenter 4 Coming Soon! | Midnight Oil Productions on How To Make Better Song Lyrics Slides for WorshipDaniel Hahn on The End of Worship Media (As We Know It)The MO Guys on The Back to Work Saleosborn4 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

